<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061</id><updated>2011-07-30T10:52:29.928-07:00</updated><category term='Insurance'/><category term='chubb'/><category term='Claims'/><category term='delaware'/><category term='allocation'/><category term='Directors and Officers'/><category term='Privacy Liability'/><title type='text'>USRE Blog</title><subtitle type='html'>A place to read stories and commentary posted by the team at U.S. Re Insurance Agency!</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>12</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-4717955234293723451</id><published>2010-01-27T16:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-27T16:50:59.945-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Don't Think You Need Privacy Liability Insurance?  Think Again!</title><content type='html'>Pending situation in Tennessee.  Local Blue Cross/Blue Shield health insurer has run up a $7million tab cleaning up the mess after they lost a laptop. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=jacksonsun&amp;amp;sParam=32630677.story"&gt;http://content.usatoday.net/dist/custom/gci/InsidePage.aspx?cId=jacksonsun&amp;amp;sParam=32630677.story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-4717955234293723451?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/4717955234293723451/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=4717955234293723451' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4717955234293723451'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4717955234293723451'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2010/01/dont-think-you-need-privacy-liability.html' title='Don&apos;t Think You Need Privacy Liability Insurance?  Think Again!'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-6218688411174539482</id><published>2010-01-27T16:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-27T16:41:47.891-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Directors and Officers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Claims'/><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>Judge orders Lloyd's to fund Stanford defense.   Good example of why "final adjudication" language is important in D&amp;amp;O policies!   Even more important is to have a "non-rescindable" policy so when the CFO takes a plea bargain everyone else doesn't loose their coverage. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Story in Houston Chronicle: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/stanford/6837100.html"&gt;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/stanford/6837100.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-6218688411174539482?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/6218688411174539482/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=6218688411174539482' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6218688411174539482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6218688411174539482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2010/01/judge-orders-lloyds-to-fund-stanford.html' title=''/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-6798542721447149007</id><published>2010-01-07T13:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T13:53:44.069-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Another Day, Another Potentially Uninsured Embezzlement Brings A Compay To Its Knees!</title><content type='html'>I tell my clients all the time to not forget the crime insurance and the employee dishonesty part in particular!   Here is yet another example of a company nearly going out of business because a "trusted employee" took everything.    Over the years people have said to me they feel that buying employee dishonesty insurance sends a message they don't trust their employees.  Not true!  People buy insurance every day for all sorts of perils that may never effect them (except life insurance of course!).  Good internal controls and insurance to back those controls up are an inexpensive way to keep this from happening to you.    I have a folder of stories just like this one that go back 25 years and most of them are small businesses who got taken for well over $100,000.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The premium for a $1,000,000 employee dishonesty insuring clause for a company with 35 employees costs about $2,500 a year.     A small investment to keep this from happening. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newburyportnews.com/punews/local_story_006223612.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.newburyportnews.com/punews/local_story_006223612.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-6798542721447149007?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/6798542721447149007/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=6798542721447149007' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6798542721447149007'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6798542721447149007'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2010/01/another-day-another-uninsured.html' title='Another Day, Another Potentially Uninsured Embezzlement Brings A Compay To Its Knees!'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-4436528932423750633</id><published>2010-01-07T13:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-07T13:15:26.254-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Timing of Disclosure Regarding Legal Problems Embroils Fidelity National</title><content type='html'>The dilemma of what legal matters warrant disclosure to shareholders is a difficult one for publicly owned companies and particularly for financial services companies who bring suits and are defendants on a regular basis.   Fidelity National Financial is just one example of a firm where shareholders are questioning the withholding of information about a legal mess.   The underlying scandal is interesting too so worth a read:  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/business/07title.html?em"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/business/07title.html?em&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-4436528932423750633?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/4436528932423750633/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=4436528932423750633' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4436528932423750633'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4436528932423750633'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2010/01/timing-of-disclosure-regarding-legal.html' title='The Timing of Disclosure Regarding Legal Problems Embroils Fidelity National'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-4371432499286627396</id><published>2009-10-16T12:16:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-16T12:16:18.477-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Behind the deal: William A. Berry sold to Suffolk due to financial concerns - Boston Business Journal:</title><content type='html'>We only handle non-construction related surety bonds but it's not every day bonding is mentioned as the prime motive for major M&amp;A activity so I'm posting this story from the Boston Business Journal that suggest Berry construction sold to Suffolk because of bonding capacity issues.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2009/10/05/daily30.html"&gt;Behind the deal: William A. Berry sold to Suffolk due to financial concerns - Boston Business Journal:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Shared via &lt;a href="http://addthis.com"&gt;AddThis&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-4371432499286627396?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/4371432499286627396/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=4371432499286627396' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4371432499286627396'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4371432499286627396'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/10/behind-deal-william-berry-sold-to.html' title='Behind the deal: William A. Berry sold to Suffolk due to financial concerns - Boston Business Journal:'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-961697074912770921</id><published>2009-10-07T06:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T06:45:43.275-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Upholds $2million Verdict Against Wal-Mart</title><content type='html'>The Mass. SJC upheld a $2million verdict in a pay discrimination case brought by a female pharmacist against Wal-Mart Stores.      &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Story from WSJ.com here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574455311605751836.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574455311605751836.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Insurance lesson here is be sure your Employment Practices Liability policy covers punitive damages!  This verdict was $1million of compensatory damages and $1million in puntive damages.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-961697074912770921?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/961697074912770921/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=961697074912770921' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/961697074912770921'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/961697074912770921'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/10/massachusetts-supreme-judicial-court.html' title='Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Upholds $2million Verdict Against Wal-Mart'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-5055164123436533170</id><published>2009-10-05T12:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T12:11:41.385-07:00</updated><title type='text'>DOL Posts Field Guidance on ERISA Bonds</title><content type='html'>The Department of Labor has published a long awaited "Field Assistance Bulletin" on &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;ERISA's&lt;/span&gt; fidelity bonding requirements.   The format is Q&amp;amp;A so it's an easy read (as these types of documents go!) so consult this when you are confronted with the age old question "how much &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ERISA&lt;/span&gt; fidelity coverage do I need?" and you may feel a bit more confident about this decision!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Link to &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;DOL&lt;/span&gt; website: &lt;a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/fab2008-4.pdf"&gt;http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/fab2008-4.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-5055164123436533170?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/5055164123436533170/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=5055164123436533170' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/5055164123436533170'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/5055164123436533170'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/10/dol-posts-field-guidance-on-erisa-bonds.html' title='DOL Posts Field Guidance on ERISA Bonds'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-6642298207955785353</id><published>2009-10-05T11:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-06T09:33:02.226-07:00</updated><title type='text'>9th Circuit Decision Emphasizes The Importance of Adequate ERISA Fiduciary Insurance</title><content type='html'>Just catching up on my summer reading here and getting some new posts on the blog.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the summer the 9&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals handed down a scathing rebuke to the fiduciaries of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, most of whom also served as directors and officers of the company 100% owned by the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;ESOP&lt;/span&gt;.   In summary the fiduciaries had an agreement with the company that it would advance defense costs to any claim made against them for breach of fiduciary duty to the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;ESOP&lt;/span&gt;.   In 2004 the company bought out a former owner's large block of stock options and paid him significant deferred compensation.   Several current and former &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;ESOP&lt;/span&gt; participants sued alleging the stock options and deferred compensation arrangements violated &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;ERISA's&lt;/span&gt; standards of prudent conduct.  The Department of Labor took an interest in the case early on and now the 9&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; Circuit has upheld a district court injunction against the company barring it from advancing any defense costs.   &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;Among&lt;/span&gt; other things the decision seems to underscore the view held by some that if an &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;ESOP&lt;/span&gt; owns 100% of a company the distinction between the legal roles and exposures of the fiduciaries of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;ESOP&lt;/span&gt; and the directors and officers of the company are practically indistinguishable.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Decision is posted here:   &lt;a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/07/27/08-17369.pdf"&gt;http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/07/27/08-17369.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-6642298207955785353?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/6642298207955785353/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=6642298207955785353' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6642298207955785353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6642298207955785353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/10/9th-circuit-decision-emphaisise.html' title='9th Circuit Decision Emphasizes The Importance of Adequate ERISA Fiduciary Insurance'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-1388935237098270131</id><published>2009-10-05T07:48:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-05T07:54:58.071-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Privacy Liability'/><title type='text'>Blue Cross physicians warned of data breach - The Boston Globe</title><content type='html'>The PLUS New England Chapter held a seminar on privacy liability on Thursday 10-1-09:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://plusweb.org/index.cfm/p/Events.EventDetails/eventID/NE1009"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;https://plusweb.org/index.cfm/p/Events.EventDetails/eventID/NE1009&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two days later the Boston Globe reports that Blue Cross Blue Shield had a laptop stolen with personal information on thousands of physicians:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://shar.es/14sj0"&gt;Blue Cross physicians warned of data breach - The Boston Globe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would appear the chapter chose a timely topic!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sharethis.com/"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-1388935237098270131?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/1388935237098270131/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=1388935237098270131' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/1388935237098270131'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/1388935237098270131'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/10/blue-cross-physicians-warned-of-data.html' title='Blue Cross physicians warned of data breach - The Boston Globe'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-4543872529304703766</id><published>2009-09-29T13:32:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-29T13:36:10.148-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Goodbye Salomon Brothers</title><content type='html'>Link to an interesting story in today's Wall Street Journal about the "final, final" end of Salomon Brothers, the firm widely credited with creating the mortgage backed securities market in the 1980s.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125417931158647695.html"&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125417931158647695.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-4543872529304703766?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/4543872529304703766/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=4543872529304703766' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4543872529304703766'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/4543872529304703766'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2009/09/goodbye-salomon-brothers.html' title='Goodbye Salomon Brothers'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-6380257117800369810</id><published>2008-08-11T06:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-11T06:52:56.884-07:00</updated><title type='text'>West Virginia Investment Management Board Loses $643 Million</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-family: times new roman;font-family:Times New Roman, Times, serif;font-size:130%;"  &gt;The West Virginia Investment Management Board&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:130%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: times new roman;"&gt; has lost hundreds of millions in the last year and this only highlights the challenges faced by the trustees of large public pension and other fiduciary funds who have to navigate through this challenging environment.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://fpn.advisen.com/articles/article81338944-1446464990.html"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click here to read the full story on Advisen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-6380257117800369810?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/6380257117800369810/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=6380257117800369810' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6380257117800369810'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/6380257117800369810'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2008/08/west-virginia-investment-management.html' title='West Virginia Investment Management Board Loses $643 Million'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-472451613352042061.post-3835530311323168885</id><published>2008-08-07T09:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-08-07T09:10:30.944-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='delaware'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Directors and Officers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='chubb'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='allocation'/><title type='text'>Important Allocation Case in Delaware</title><content type='html'>John Paul Sutrich at ARI Risk Management told me about this case yesterday and now its on Advisen.   A real blow to insurers using "allocation language" to force insureds to negotiate on defense costs before a case is resolved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See Advisen Story: &lt;a href="http://fpn.advisen.com/articles/article81238054-546578096.html"&gt;http://fpn.advisen.com/articles/article81238054-546578096.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the soft market for pricing and coverage on D&amp;amp;O continues the pain for insurers on cases still working their way through the legal pipeline makes one wonder how profitable this line of coverage is for them?   Only time will tell.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/472451613352042061-3835530311323168885?l=usreins.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/feeds/3835530311323168885/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=472451613352042061&amp;postID=3835530311323168885' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/3835530311323168885'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/472451613352042061/posts/default/3835530311323168885'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://usreins.blogspot.com/2008/08/important-allocation-case-in-delaware.html' title='Important Allocation Case in Delaware'/><author><name>Joe Curley</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01061544481305824159</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
